> Back to Archive Main Originally Published:
JUNE 17, 2003

Big, Bigger, Biggest

I’m trying to figure out exactly when it was that we collectively decided in this country that large was no longer large enough. Was the decision made by some bored advertising executive on Madison Avenue who arbitrarily declared one day that everything American consumers purchased should be bigger? Are the sizes of portions and products merely the marketplace’s response to the consumer’s demand for bigger, larger everything? What about terrorism – could this all be some subversive plot to keep America down by making us fat, broke, and environmentally unfriendly?

Far fetched? Maybe – but you tell me what sane, rational human being would decide that a 32 ounce soda at a movie theatre was not nearly large enough. Now you can purchase the 64 ounce bucket of soda (that’s nearly 2 liters my friends) to go with your tub of popcorn. Sure, I love diet Coke and all but I’d like to think I can make it two hours without downing a six pack, to say nothing of the resulting required bathroom trips.

Or consider McDonalds French Fries. How was it concluded that the old “Large” serving with 6.2 ounces of fries and a whopping 540 calories and 26 grams of fat wasn’t quite gluttonous enough? Now we have “Super-Size” fries with 610 calories and 29 grams of fat. One Super Size fry is nearly 25% of the recommended daily calories for the average adult male and you haven’t even gotten to the cheeseburger yet.

Lest you think it’s just our portions we like bigger, consider America’s fascination with SUVs. Not content with vehicles merely large enough to accommodate the family, we like trucks large enough to accommodate our family, the neighbor’s family, and a few random strangers. If it’s also capable of rolling right over Datsuns without even upsetting the suspension, well great. Never mind that the thing gets three gallons to the mile or costs $120 to fill – it sure does look great stuck in traffic!

And how about the corporate culture? Apparently bored with regular-old million-dollar mergers, the last decade has seen megamergers – behemoth joining behemoth to create one mind-bogglingly enormous company with more assets than the average mid-sized nation. Sure, megamergers are somewhat contradictory in that they usually result in the seemingly small practice of downsizing, but when you consider that downsizing is merely a tool to obtain “super size” profits, well, then, it all makes sense.

When did we start living so large? When did size begin to matter so much? Are we, as a nation, compensating for some collective sense of inadequacy or are we just a country of gluttons, the first megaconsumers of our species? Will our quest for larger portions of everything ever end?

I sure hope so, if only to stop the incessant stream of emails I receive on a daily basis offering to “super size” portions of my male anatomy. I mean – geesh – the size of things really isn’t that important.

Is it?


This Essay © 2003 Lee Totten